Check the question’s scope
Name the exact person, organisation, event and time you meant. A fact about another customer or an earlier period may look relevant without answering your question. Ask the agent to separate the answer it can support from background or inference.
Ask what was read
Have the agent name the maps and source records it used. Open them. If it searched but did not open the results, ask it to read the promising sources before making a claim. A failed or partial search is different from a successful read finding no support. Finding the source explains the normal route.
Distinguish absent information from a boundary
If the record is not available, check the intended Mind, account and area. A refusal can reflect access; a current-view exclusion can reflect memory status. Neither is a reason to try another identity or copy protected information into chat. Zones and permissions explains what a missing result does not establish.
Check freshness and conflicting evidence
For today’s guidance, ask for current information. For a past statement, ask for the evidence from that period. If sources disagree and no decision resolves them, keep the uncertainty visible and ask an authorised person to decide.
Correct the part that is wrong
If the source is sound, point to the passage the answer misunderstood and ask the agent to explain the mismatch. If information is missing, save the missing source. If the saved record is wrong, propose one precise correction with the evidence behind it.
After a correction applies, open the record and ask the original question again. A better sentence in the conversation is not proof that the underlying source changed.
Fix the source or the explanation
Where did the answer fail?
First open the sources behind the answer and check their subject, date and scope. If the source is sound but the explanation is wrong, ask the agent to re-read and explain the mismatch. If the source is missing or wrong, supply the missing evidence or propose a correction. After any correction applies, read the record and ask the original question again.
Leave a precise unresolved gap
If the evidence still does not settle the question, say what is missing and who could supply it. Do not turn a lack of evidence into a confident answer. That gap is a useful result when it prevents someone acting on a guess.
Related
Practical guides for people and agents